发布网友 发布时间:2022-04-23 16:08
共2个回答
热心网友 时间:2022-04-27 21:05
白水是一种化学品,化学式是C4H10O3。
中文名
过氧化甲乙酮
别称
白水
化学式
C4H10O3
密度
约1.091
属于酮过氧化物,外观是柔软的不变色的白色粉末或硬块(液体存在的形式较为常见)。
热心网友 时间:2022-04-27 22:23
乳白色的海又名“白水”
" August 13, 1986. Northwest Indian Ocean . The entire sea surface took on an intense white glow which was not unlike viewing the negative of a photograph." “1986年8月13日,西北印度洋 ,整个海面了一个强烈的白光,这是不是不像观看照片的负。“
The milky sea is a rather common phenomenon.乳白色的海,是一个相当普遍的现象。 In fact, the British Meteorological Office has established a Bioluminescence Database, which presently contains 235 reports of milky seas seen since 1915.事实上,英国气象局建立了生物发光的数据库,目前包含235自1915年以来,见过的银河系海洋的报告。 PJ Herring and M. Watson have employed this Database in a review paper on these impressive displays. PJ鲱鱼和M.沃森在审查文件雇用这个数据库,这些令人印象深刻的显示器上。
Geographical plotting of the reports shows a strong concentration in the northwest Indian Ocean (see figure).地理绘制的报告显示了强烈的浓度在西北印度洋(见图)。 Seasonally, there is a strong peaking in August and a secondary blip in January.季节性的,有较强的峰值在8月和一月份的第二昙花一现。 The phenomenon is independent of water depth and distance from land.这种现象是从陆地的水深和距离无关。
Surely bioluminescent organisms must be the explanation for milky seas.当然发光的生物,必须解释为乳白色海洋。 But most such organisms simply flash briefly and are incapable of generating the strong, steady glow of the milky sea.但大多数这类生物体只是短暂闪烁并不能产生乳白色的海强,稳定辉光。 Marine bacteria alone glow steadily.仅海洋细菌焕发稳步增长。 However, calculations show that unrealistic concentrations of bacteria would be needed to generate the observed light.然而,计算表明,不切实际的细菌浓度,将需要产生所观察到的的光。 Furthermore, samples from the affected waters show no such bacteria.此外,从受影响的水域的样品显示没有这种细菌。 Herring and Watson admit there is no acceptable explanation of the milky sea.鲱鱼和沃森承认有可以接受的解释是没有乳白色的海上的。 What, they ask, is so special about the northwest Indian Ocean?什么,他们会问,对西北印度洋是如此特殊? Why do milky seas not occur in the adjacent Red Sea and Persian Gulf?乳白色的海洋为什么不发生在相邻的红海和波斯湾? These bodies of water seem equally promising.这些机构的水,似乎同样看好。